Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Luxiang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. ^{(non-admin closure)} st170e^talk 15:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wang Luxiang[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has nothing convincing for the applicable solid independent notability and its improvements, my searches have simply found nothing better at all. SwisterTwister talk 04:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

alt:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep per being arguably notable to China. My own searches (sorry about your broken google-foo nominator) finds sources [1][2][3] (many needing translation [4][5][6]) to support this film critic / producer as meeting WP:CREATIVE. Needs work, not deletion. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per MQS. Passes WP:GNG, if barely. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.