The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:55, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
unsourced article; dictionary definition at best John Broughton | Talk 19:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable neologism and because Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Heimstern Läufer 07:03, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Heimstern Läufer. It's unsourced/unverified to boot. Agent 86 11:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
