Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waleed Iqbal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Greenbörg (talk) 07:29, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Waleed Iqbal[edit]

Waleed Iqbal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not inherited nor it makes you notable by joining a party. Most sources only name check him. No source discusses him. He actually fails WP:NPOL. He can only be notable by WP:GNG which requires significant coverage. Greenbörg (talk) 06:18, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:33, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:33, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:33, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Week Keep OK. so the subject has received a lot of press coverage and had unsuccessfully ran for the seat of the parliament, but he doesn't meet WP:POLITICIAN so i suggest week Keep. --Saqib (talk) 06:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.