Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wakefield (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --bainer (talk) 01:16, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wakefield (band)[edit]

NN band -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 05:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Improve. It's worthy of inclusion, but it lacks in content. If someone can add more noteworthy information, than I'm fine with it being on there. If not, Delete. Human historian 06:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Nothing of note, per nom. Akihabara 15:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. The best this band has going for them, notability wise, is that they apparently have the former drummer from Good Charlotte... but once you dig a little deeper, you find out that this drummer left Good Charlotte just before they made it big (he's like the Fifth Beatle of crappy emo/psuedo-punk bands!) In the article's defense: The band does appear to have been on a major label and released two albums, satisfying some of WP:MUSIC. However, no sources or even an attempt to describe these albums as successful. -- Antepenultimate 23:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and improve. Notable per involvement of Aaron Escolopio. Mus Musculus 16:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, •••日本穣^{? • Talk to Nihonjoe} 04:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Week keep I'm leaning toward keep because I thought a band becomes notable after it cuts a record, of which this band has done twice. I think a cleanup tag and a CT desk assignment is more proper than deleting it. Am I way off course here?--Clyde Miller 05:10, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (conditional) - They are notable to some extent (see external link). I place merger templates on the related articles and added info to the talk page that may help move this article along. If the article is not moved forward in a reasonable amount of time and is place up for AfD again, consider my position a delete.-- Jreferee 19:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article states that they released two albums on Arista and Jive Records, both of which are quite notable labels. As such, they meet Criterion 5 of WP:BAND. —ShadowHalo 21:59, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:MUSIC. --badlydrawnjeff talk 14:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep please releasing albums with arista and jive records is obvious notability under our music guideline Yuckfoo 02:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes WP:MUSIC and seems notable enough. --Wizardman 18:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.