Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waismann Method
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Waismann Method[edit]
- Waismann Method (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reputable sources are given in the article, and Google Scholar does not show any publications describing this method. We should not have articles about medical treatments that lack scholarly sources. Looie496 (talk) 17:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, and also for strong promotional tone: article appears to be a WP:COATRACK for a treatment center. MuffledThud (talk) 19:13, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as promotional, as well as possible copy-and-paste from various parts of http://www.opiates.com. --Hnsampat (talk) 06:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom and promotional concerns; almost reads like a "how-to" guide. Cocytus [»talk«] 04:47, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.