Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wael Elrifai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wael Elrifai[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article makes no claim of any significant impact the individual has had, and there are only passing mentions in reliable sources — failing BASIC. I cannot find any in-depth coverage of the book he co-authored, apart from a review from insideBIGDATA — does not meet NAUTHOR. — The Most Comfortable Chair 16:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — The Most Comfortable Chair 16:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — The Most Comfortable Chair 16:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — The Most Comfortable Chair 16:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — The Most Comfortable Chair 16:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Fails GNG. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 21:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO, for lack of significant coverage.Brayan ocaner (talk) 23:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.