Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWNN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to fibre channel. Royboy crashfan 03:25, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WWNN[edit]

What the Hell is this? Only one sentence, and no real information. The Republican 02:04, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I don't see anything wrong with it. Looks like it's just a stub to me. (However, it's probably a better idea to move it to the full, expanded name and have the initialization be a redirect...) --Typobox43 02:07, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After taking a look at the Fibre Channel article, I see that we already have a World Wide Name article. Therefore, I say that we Redirect this to that article rather than to Fibre Channel. --Typobox43 21:14, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Wiktionary I can finally say that some article can be moved to Wiktionary! :) This does define some abbreviation, so I really, strongly think that this should be moved to Wiktionary.Redirect per TBC. Funnybunny 21:47, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps a merge and redirect to Fibre Channel? --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 03:20, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per TBC. Royboy crashfan 03:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep no good reason for deletion given. For great justice. 04:04, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect keep it in fibre channel T K E 06:17, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Fibre Channel. --Ter e nc e Ong 12:59, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As it stands, this isn't an "article," it's a dicdef. RGTraynor 14:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Fibre Channel. I also agree. --Francisco Valverde 15:19, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Move to wiktionary. This page is relating to a fibre channel SAN, not to fibre channel which is a networking protocol. I am no expert on fibre channel, but this term (AFAIK) is not related to fibre channel, but to something else which can be implemented using fibre channel. -- cmh 01:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
merge and redirect to Fibre Channel, or delete, not notable enough for it's own page. Radagast83 19:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.