Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE & Company

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Christopher Lau. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WWE & Company[edit]

WWE & Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. I also checked the sources of the article on zh.wp, and there are only PRs. Maybe Chinese-speaking users can find independent reliable sources where I couldn't. Broc (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Wharf (Holdings). IgelRM (talk) 04:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why? It is not a fully owned subsidiary and it is not even mentioned in that article. Broc (talk) 07:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is a joint venture, although Christopher Lau might be better redirect according to jingdaily.
WWE & Company is mentioned and linked in history? With company names, I think it is generally helpful to redirect to something associated. IgelRM (talk) 07:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there are multiple Redirect/Merge targets being suggested here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.