Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WUWB-LD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WUWB-LD[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks the necessary WP:SIGCOV from secondary sources with which to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun (talk) 19:25, 3 January 2024 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related page for the same reason:[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Michigan. Let'srun (talk) 19:25, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Diginet coatracks built in the last 10 years with no SIGCOV on them or the company. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:45, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: These are the types of no-profile stations (even "low-profile" may still imply some coverage or significance) that only got articles under the more lax (interpretations of) notability standards of pre-2021. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.