Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WPDN-LD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Daystar affiliates#Pennsylvania. (non-admin closure) Ifnord (talk) 17:36, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WPDN-LD[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, does not meet WP:GNG. Previously deleted by PROD by GB fan with the concern I think this is an example of a small non-notable television station. google news comes up with absolutely zero results, and I cant find anything else in a normal google search except the standard directory listings which do not contribute to notability.. I believe that this concern stands for the recreated article as well. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:24, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BROADCAST Legacypac (talk) 23:29, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That guideline says that notability is assumed for television stations that create their own original content. However, I see no evidence that this station creates original content. I think that we can consider redirecting to the station's owner (and the presumed producer of its content), Daystar (TV network). _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:48, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Daystar affiliates#Pennsylvania It's a Daystar repeater stick with little history outside of that (until 2010 it repeated TBN). Still doing a ping for article creator @Editguy123849: to fill the article in the next seven days, but I don't expect it to be easy to rescue without more sources. Nate • (chatter) 05:52, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sheldybett (talk) 15:17, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (or re-direct) - none of the notability criteria for broadcast media appears to be met.--Rpclod (talk) 17:37, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, Not notable on its own.Do not delete, can be a part of owner Co page Alex-h (talk) 08:47, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, I am sorry about my mistake, I do agree with you. I do have a question: this article meets the same notability as WWBP-LP yet that article was not deleted? Why is that? Editguy123849 (talk) 10:13, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment It hasn't been nominated for deletion; it probably would meet the same fate if it was put up, to be honest. Nate • (chatter) 01:22, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.