Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WOH S279

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WOH S279[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NASTRO, WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV and entirely relies on large-scale surveys. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 19:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom: no hits on Google Scholar ([1], [2]) coverage is limited to databases etc. or Wikipedia forks/mirrors ([3], [4], [5]). Fails WP:NASTRO. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:51, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Article briefly PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:15, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, I guess. Seems a pity; would be nice to have somewhere to transwiki this sort of thing. -- Visviva (talk) 23:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.