Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WHCQ-LD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WHCQ-LD[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Most recent edits were by User:Whcq, which proves WP:COI. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:54, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Mississippi. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:54, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Many of the same (GNG and COI) issues with the articles for co-owned WPRQ-LD and WEBU-LD apply here too. This old revision does suggest there was some local programming at one point, but since that had been added by Dellington (talk · contribs), and the station is owned by David Ellington, it also helps establish how longstanding the COI issues are here. On the off chance any sufficient sourcing comes up to allow for anything substantial here (no, I am not holding my breath), it might still require TNT at best. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:09, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.