Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W. Russell Neuman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SNOW and WP:PROF - the subject has named professorship, many citations, major awards, etc. Bearian (talk) 16:52, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

W. Russell Neuman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The resume linked from the article persuaded me that this is a non-notable person, one of millions of college faculty. I might be wrong, you decide East of Borschov 20:09, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. GS gives cites of 645, 431, 340... to give an h index of 19, so passes WP:ProfC#1. He also holds a named chair so passesWP:ProfC#5. Nominator is advised to study WP:Before. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:01, 2 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, per Xxanthippe. Named chair at the University Michigan - satisfies WP:ProfC#5. I have added refs to several academic awards to the article. Nsk92 (talk) 06:01, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I'm not certain whether the awards rise to the level of passing WP:PROF but the named chair and the citation record certainly both do, and thanks to Nsk92 this is now adequately sourced for its current content. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. WoS shows ~300 citations for simple query of WR Neuman, but could be more with a more sophisticated search. This is an easy pass on PROF #1. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 15:04, 4 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.