Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vuy Aman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vuy Aman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN recording. I changed this to a redirect to the artiste (which I favour over deletion) but the edit was reverted by page creator. TheLongTone (talk) 11:49, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do notice a claim of notability...No 1 on Armenian iTunes. Seems inadequate to me, tho.TheLongTone (talk) 11:53, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it could go either way. One one hand, platform-specific charts like iTunes fails WP:BADCHARTS, but that being said, usually something popular enough to top even a "bad chart" would probably be likely to have the coverage to scrape by on the WP:GNG. Purely hypothetically speaking though, "Armenian pop music" is far from my area of expertise in the music world... Sergecross73 msg me 18:43, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 13:25, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 13:25, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep from a google search it is made manifest that the song does bare notability to a reasonable extent.Celestina007 (talk) 03:07, 01 November 2017 (UTC

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.