Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VoucherCodes.co.uk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 23:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

VoucherCodes.co.uk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - Not notable, and reads like an advertorial. Phatwa (talk) 20:01, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:24, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:24, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GNG, WP:CORP and WP:RS, Also there no different from Groupon. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 15:52, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore above - Was clearly in a world of my own!, DELETE - It's just promotional BS, -

→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 23:51, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:ADS , dubiously someone has added non-notable PR log/junk as references. Possibly being used as marketing. Slickmick1212 (talk) 08:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:RS. Groupon have IPOd and are global leader etc. No different to having articles for the plethora of Groupon clones. Vereingingen →Talk page→ 15:19, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:WEB, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Econversions, which appears to be notable only for launching the Vouchercodes site, could have been bundled here for deletion on the same grounds. On the other hand, WhaleShark Media, which now owns both Econversions and VoucherCodes.co.uk among other things, appears to be notable enough for an article. Captain Conundrum (talk) 00:52, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't think it needs to be deleted, just re-edited. Its a big website in the UK, if you take this page down you might as well take down most website pages down. davidmorgans (talk) 08:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I see you created the Wiki page. But now you want to delete it... Can you clarify? Phatwa (talk) 06:46, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't create the page Phatwa. Wikipedia suggests an edit before deletion, so I'm just following their guidelines davidmorgans (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:52, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.