Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vote for pimp (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 2014 Egyptian presidential election. Content may be merged from the history as necessary; no clear consensus for a merger here, but there is at least consensus this should not stand as an article, and a reasonable redirect target has been proposed. Vanamonde (Talk) 02:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vote for pimp[edit]

Vote for pimp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:SUSTAINED and WP:NTEMP, this was a trend in social media in 2014 and just a news story covered in many newspapers (WP:NEWSBRIEF), no historical impact nor importance. Ibrahim.ID ✪ 17:05, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:08, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:08, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Mohamedhp: I'm not sure that there's enough coverage of the twitter campaign to require an entire section of it's own, but there does seem to be a few bits of content there that would be worth merging to make a paragraph or two in the article on the election. If the nickname has become something that has attracted long term coverage throughout his presidency perhaps it would be worth adding to Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, perhaps in the section Abdel Fattah el-Sisi#Political opposition? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:39, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:25, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.