Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vorkosigan Saga Inconsistencies (second nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. --Fang Aili 說嗎? 22:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vorkosigan Saga Inconsistencies[edit]
Original Research. xompanthy 22:44, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I view this as a clear violation of NOR policy, not to mention nonsense. Result of the last deletion debate for this article was merge, even though the vote stood at 4 delete, 2 merge, 1 move. xompanthy 22:47, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree that it's original research - I can come up with all sorts of counters to the supposed inconsistencies but WP is not Usenet. Jamoche 00:09, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I nominated this for deletion the first time and have always believed it is a textbook case of original research.--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 02:27, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete definitely WP:OR --Deville (Talk) 05:54, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's a good article for a Fanzine or Webzine but not for Wikipedia. CWC(talk) 07:31, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. Weak merely because I read it with a speck of interest. Definitely OR, though. Hornplease 08:53, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOR. Stifle (talk) 18:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.