Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voodoo Six (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 05:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voodoo Six[edit]

Voodoo Six (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this satisfies WP:NMUSIC, they don't have any charts/awards, and most of the sources are from Discogs or their official website. Noah!💬 18:30, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete One of the sources not from Discogs or their website is a permanent dead link, although there is an article of one of the members. -Cupper52Discuss! 18:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1: Per WP:NMUSIC point 1. Has been featured in multiple articles such as:

2: Per WP:NMUSIC point 4. Has received non trivial coverage of an international concert tour with the band Iron Maiden.

Has also featured in the lineup of 5 mainstream Rock Festivals being that of Download Festival and Sonisphere Festival as already references in the original article. - Deadhell 19:54, 10 March 2021 (GMT)

  • Weak keep as they do have a staff written AllMusic bio and coverage in Classic Rock magazine, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 01:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: In particular, editors may discuss the sources that were brought up later in the discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — MarkH21talk 07:24, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per Deadhell. Macktheknifeau (talk) 07:39, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per Deadhell, the article definitely needs better referencing but reliable sources about the band are not hard to find. pinktoebeans (talk) 18:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.