Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voniak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. The Placebo Effect (talk) 16:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Voniak[edit]

Seems to be a hoax made up by someone with too much time on their hands, not to mention fails WP:NOTE. Tiptoety (talk) 00:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Author note- This article is NOT a hoax and shoud not be considered for deletion. Voniak is a special version of stuffed animal, and I believe it has significance enough to be included in the list of toys. I'm sorry you don't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voniak (talk • contribs)
Speedy delete. Nonsense. Corvus cornix_talk 00:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Author note- Well maybe it looks like nonsense, but it's the real thing and as such I don't see a reason why it shouldn't be included in the encyclopedia which aims to gather the knowledge about everything (if I'm not mistaken). There's much bigger nonsense than this around. Definitely I think this is suitable for Stuffed animal subcategory, if such exists. It's too late where I'm from so I'm not in a mood to argue, so I;m just sorry you don't see the point. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Voniak (talk • contribs) 00:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - You are quite mistaken. Read WP:V, WP:NOTE and WP:RS. And no, I don't see the point. Should we have an article on everybody's stuffed animals? This is not MySpace. Corvus cornix_talk 00:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. This article should be a poster child for speedy deletion. Qworty (talk) 00:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Jeez! --brew crewer (yada, yada) 00:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:MADEUP. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 01:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~Strong Delete~~Avalanche - ~~no hits on a google search. There are no sources, and I doubt any can be found. Even, if as the author claims, it is real (which I highly doubt), there is no way to reference it properly.~~ Per Sudoku424 and WP:SNOW. LonelyBeacon (talk) 01:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Very Strong Really Speedy Delete - if you go to the website that the article says about it, it even says right there that the author has made this up themselves. in their words, "voniak- adjective : Any crazy critter (like the one sitting on Voniak) is called by me a voniak...b'coz it is crazy" that website also has a link to "my other crazy critters". note the word my. Sudoku424 (talk) 01:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "There's much bigger nonsense than this around"?! Clarityfiend (talk) 02:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball delete. In addition to all the above, let's not forget WP:OR --Blanchardb-^{MeMyEarsMyMouth}-timed 02:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Not because it's nonsense, not because it's not notable (which it's not), but because somebody is using this as a webhost for their homemade irritant toy. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:39, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable, OR, WP:Neologism Aleta (talk) 05:15, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, if nothing else, it falls under WP:NEO. Lankiveil (talk) 11:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - non-notable vanity page. LeContexte (talk) 14:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and everybody else. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 15:45, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.