Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voluntold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This can be transwikied under request from any sysop of Wiktionary. My expereince says they are unlikely to want it, however. Courcelles (talk) 19:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voluntold[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dictionary definition and neologism. There is coverage in urban dictionary and some similar resources, but not sources I'd generally consider reliable. In searching Google News, there is usage (about 50 hits?) but nothing I saw there that provides coverage of the term rather than simply using it (see WP:NEO.) I'm recommending either outright deletion or transcoding to Wiktonary. j⚛e decker ^talk 22:05, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki and delete to Wiktionary per WP:NOTDICTIONARY and WP:NEO. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 01:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 10:53, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki and delete per above. It's not really a topic. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 11:08, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki and delete It's not a totally made-up term [1], more of a slightly-known neologism, but it does not belong here. If it is transwiki'ed it should be as the present tense, voluntell, not the past tense voluntold. --MelanieN (talk) 18:12, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki and delete This is a dictionary definition and this isn't a dictionary. Sharksaredangerous (talk) 22:46, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTDICTIONARY and because it is a WP:NEO, ~~though I do not object to a transwiki, either~~. Novaseminary (talk) 02:06, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Do not transwiki to Wiktionary as they do not want this article: it lacks sufficient references and they will just have to go to the trouble of researching and deleting it all over. Herostratus (talk) 03:16, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.