Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volcanic Eruptions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete/redirect. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Volcanic Eruptions[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-Notable. Vanity production company for Crispin Hellion Glover with no significant (if any) hits on Google and Yahoo. Only produced less then a hand full (3 to be exact) films and has no other significant contributions or works that warrant inclusion in Wikipedia. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 07:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:26, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting this to Types of volcanic eruptions would appear to me to be an Obvious Right Thing. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:26, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Pardon, but this article is about Crispin Glover's company, and not about any type of volcanic eruption. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:58, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Which is why, even if this were a notable business, it should have appeared at Volcanic Eruptions (company). Somebody searching for "Volcanic Eruptions" is probably not looking for Crispin Glover. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect ^ — cocomonkilla | talk | contrib 17:02, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect the name "Vocanic eruptions (company)" to Crispin Glover where his company is already mentioned. Does not have available sources to support a separate article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:58, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and insert a redirect to Types of volcanic eruptions. If the company ever does become notable (or if for some reason the company is found to be notable at present), having an article with this name is only going to trigger user confusion; if merited, the company's article should at the very least be differentiated from the geological phenomena by a title along the lines of "Volcanic Eruptions (film company)".Tyrenon (talk) 20:40, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree... a delete and redirect of the term should go to Types of volcanic eruptions. But in case a reader is looking for the film company, and as it does not yet merit a separate article, we can then set a redirect of the term "Volcanic Eruptions (film company)" to where it is already mentioned in the Crispin Glover article so as to differentiate the two. Sensible. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to DAB. There may be a minority looking for info on recent eruptions, famous eruptions, etc. Ken Tholke (talk) 17:02, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Coment: As it is a reasonable search term, I have created the redirect for Volcanic Eruptions (film company) to the company's founder Crispin Glover, where it can be spoken of in context. The redirect of Volcanic Eruptions as an event descriptive can be redirected to Types of volcanic eruptions when/if this current article is deleted. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.