Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volareweb.com destinations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Volareweb.com. Stifle (talk) 12:58, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Volareweb.com destinations[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bringing to AFD after a speedy attempt (was declined) for A10 (see {{db-same}}. This article covers destinations for a defunct airline - which is OK, but it also duplicates work already in existence in the main article for Volareweb.com. A merge is inappropriate (nothing to merge). Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:28, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Volareweb.com. - Ahunt (talk) 20:44, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect or Merge - Redirect if this content is already on the main page. I just glanced at the main page and didn't see it but that may be due to someone trying to circumvent Dennis' argument. If it's there, redirect. If it's not there, merge it in. The list won't be growing so I see no future need for its own space. OlYeller^Talktome 20:57, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- ...eh. History on article says it was removed. I'll wait for consensus. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, there is no need for a redirect or a merge IMO. Looking at the edit histories, the creator of the destinations article removed the destinations from the airline article; in the same minute and immediately after starting the destinations article; in what was basically a cut-and-paste job. The separate destinations article is not warranted - it's not so big as to require hiving it off from the airline article. Undo the deletion from the airline article and delete the destinations article, and we are all square. YSSYguy (talk) 12:52, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge back into the main article. Herostratus (talk) 03:11, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into main article per above. The redirect will not be useful, so delete afte the merge. Novaseminary (talk) 04:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.