Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volante Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Volante Systems[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is blatant advertising; it is an orphan page for a non-notable company with all "references" coming from the company website. A clear case of self-promotion. See similar: PixelPoint, PCS Revenue Control Systems. Timneu22 (talk) 23:17, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable-source coverage at all. Google reveals the company's own website, press releases, and this article. --MelanieN (talk) 04:13, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This business is a a point of sale/ERP/CRM software corporation. If you understand that, your film badge dosimeter is showing overexposure. I'd say this stub makes no minimal case for importance as an organization. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:20, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:57, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Click the link up top that says Google news. Do you think every company out there is seen as important enough to get mentioned in the news at all? There are 72 news results which mention this company. Their parent company was bought out in 2006 by Commander Communications, which I assume now owns them. Dream Focus 05:36, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - There is a remarkable similarity between this article/software and PixelPoint - also up for AfD, and also in Toronto, as mentioned by User:Timneu22.--Kudpung (talk) 02:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.