Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voice of the People – VOX humana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:28, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voice of the People – VOX humana[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure why the subject is notable. Fails on WP:GNG and WP:CLUB, no coverage in reliable sources. Official website of this party is a dead link. I do find some references to "Folkets Röst" in Swedish language but I am not sure whether they are reliable or just trivial. The article on Swedish Wikipedia is unreferenced too and official website links to a parked domain. Hitro talk 19:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Actually, there is plenty of coverage in media: http://www.ltz.se/jamtland/harjedalen/vox-humana-tankbar-partner-for-bada-sidor , http://www.tidningenharjedalen.se/medelpad/sundsvall/vox-humana-regiontillhorighet-viktigaste-framtidsfragan , http://www.sveg.se/alliansen-vox-humana-och-h%C3%A4rjedalspartiet-kan-bryta-s-styre , http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=78&artikel=5955094 , http://www.svt.se/nyheter/regionalt/jamtland/osakert-lage-i-harjedalen , http://www.op.se/vox-humana-krympte-rejalt-i-harjedalen , http://www.st.nu/medelpad/sundsvall/hon-valjer-sundsvall-framfor-valjarna , http://www.jaktojagare.se/kategorier/aktuellt/flera-sager-nej-till-varg/ , http://www.ltz.se/jamtland/harjedalen/vox-humana-demokratin-ar-satt-ur-spel , http://www.ltz.se/jamtland/harjedalen/vox-humana-kan-bli-tungan-pa-vagen-1 , http://www.op.se/jamtland/harjedalen/vox-humana-kan-bli-tungan-pa-vagen , http://www.op.se/jamtland/harjedalen/vox-humana-kritiserar-skolprojekt , http://www.op.se/jamtland/harjedalen/vox-humana-vill-ha-lekplats-for-pensionarer , http://www.op.se/jamtland/harjedalen/vox-humana-vill-aktualisera-oversiktsplan , http://www.op.se/jamtland/harjedalen/sa-tufft-blir-valet-i-harjedalen , http://www.op.se/jamtland/harjedalen/inget-kyrkoval-for-vox-humana-i-hogdal , http://www.op.se/jamtland/harjedalen/rattvis-demokrati-vox-humana-sant , http://www.op.se/jamtland/harjedalen/storslam-i-namndsval-for-minoritetsstyre-1 , http://www.op.se/jamtland/harjedalen/upplagt-for-historiskt-maktbyte , http://www.op.se/jamtland/harjedalen/kommunens-sponsring-ifragasatts-2 , http://www.op.se/vh-s-toppnamn-vill-inte-bli-oppositionsrad-jag-valjer-sundsvall , http://www.op.se/jamtland/harjedalen/harjedalen-ska-styras-av-tre-partier-2 , http://www.op.se/blir-vv-sd-eller-rhv-arets-raket , etc. --Soman (talk) 04:15, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment- Haven't you populated and crowded your comment with the links from few similar sources... ltz.se op.se and tidningenharjedalen.se... they all look similar websites... Please explain why are they reliable. Hitro talk 20:18, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ltz.se is Länstidningen, op.se is Östersunds-Posten, i.e. the two main daily newspapers published from Östersund. St.nu is Sundsvalls Tidning. sverigesradio is, well, Sveriges Radio. svt.se is Sveriges Television. Tidningen Härjedalen is a weekly edition in Härjedalen of LTZ. --Soman (talk) 00:20, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 22:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 22:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:17, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. per plenty more of coverage provided by user Soman.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:18, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.