Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimir Nasedkin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar · · 18:40, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Vladimir Nasedkin[edit]
- Vladimir Nasedkin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Escalating from prod. Not a single award mentioned in text appears notable. No inline cites. Big list of a lot of stuff, none of which look mainstream; that includes a long list of "bibliography" which likely is heavily composed of a passing mention in tiny circulation exhibition catalogs or such. Needs opinion from a Russian speaker to verify sources/comment on notability in Russian-language net. Can't verify if a ru wiki article exists as the creator did not add the subject name in Cyrillic. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:49, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 00:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:28, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per exhibitions and breadth of showings at institutions. A review by a Russian editor would certainly be helpful. Candleabracadabra (talk) 16:43, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.