Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivienne Marcheline Jolie-Pitt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vivienne Marcheline Jolie-Pitt[edit]

Contested prod. Article is about a celebrity child and notability is not inherited. At best, this should be a redirect to Jolie or Pitt. TN‑X-Man 19:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CSD#A7 Notability is not shown and WP:NOTINHERITED as you say. --triwbe (talk) 19:29, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it will not be long before someone sites sources (like 2 billion g-hits) about the birth, but I remind those who do WP:NOT#NEWS. Since all of the sources will be about the single event instead of the person, the notability is not being established. Mention it in Bard and Angie's articles, but not a separate one yet. LonelyBeacon (talk) 19:43, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete this non-notable newborns biography --Rocksanddirt (talk) 19:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. freshacconcispeaktome 19:55, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTINHERITED isn't a speedy criterion — it's an example of bad reasoning in an essay that serves to guide, but not dictate, the process of building AFD consensus. The article does make a notability claim, and as such AFD is the correct procedure here. That said, the notability claim being made is invalid according to Wikipedia policy on such matters, until such time as she has notable accomplishments of her own besides being born to famous parents, so it is an obvious delete even though it doesn't fall under speedy. Bearcat (talk) 21:01, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- we're not a news service, and this child is not notable in her own right at this time. J Milburn (talk) 21:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent notability. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 21:16, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to one of the parents. I think its the best course of action here.--Lenticel ^(talk) 23:01, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to Angelina Jolie#Children per precedent and all above. We have been through this before with other celebrity children, including some of Jolie's. In fact, I created Vivienne Jolie-Pitt as a redirect to Jolie's article in hopes of dissuading the creation of an article such as this. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete again non-notable inheritently, not done anything notable yet (if ever) Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and WP:SALT Delete because there is clearly no notability that can be presumed for the subject of this article nor its twin. SALT because rabid Brangelina fans find this sort of WP:CRUFT exremely important and will keep recreating to no end. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 13:12, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As noted, notability is not inherited. I agree article needs to be salted otherwise people will be recreating it repeatedly. 23skidoo (talk) 14:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability is not inherited, and Wikipedia is not a newspaper to create article about everything that gets headlines. Mention the child in the articles about the parents. Edison (talk) 18:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.