Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viviana Campanile Zagorianakou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:04, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Viviana Campanile Zagorianakou[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to only be notable for a single event, a Greek beauty pageant (which she won) and, more dubiously, for competing in Miss Universe. The coverage that I can find is all very much concentrated around that one event, and is news rather than analysis (WP:NOTNEWS, and she doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. Indeed, practically all of the first page of Google on her is mirrors and copies of this article. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 11:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 17. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Beauty pageants, Greece, and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I added some references, although they may not be enough to prove notability. A bit of speculation: If she is still the romantic partner of Ilias Kasidiaris, a former member of parliament who is currently in prison, she may run for office herself. I will leave it to people who are more familiar with Greek politics than I am to say whether this is likely. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think that would fall under WP:TOOSOON, wouldn't it? That is, we shouldn't have an article because of something that might happen (unless it's been covered extensively as a possibility in sources, so GNG is met that way): if we think she might become notable in the future, the usual pathway would be to delete the article for now but recreate it if/when the situation changes. We do the same for e.g. sporting events in the far future: we shouldn't create 2048 Olympic Games at the moment, even though it's 100% certain that that topic will pass GNG and need an article in the future. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 14:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

delete no, it is not even known in Greece, it only appears on gossip sites ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη (talk) 23:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:27, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not in depth coverage by RS. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.