Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivian Ikechukwu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Consensus for keep per the new additions. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vivian Ikechukwu[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NSPORT. I couldn't find any secondary reliable and independent sources about her. Aintabli (talk) 03:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Football, Nigeria, and Turkey. Aintabli (talk) 03:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Clearly fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per improvements made by @CeeGee. Svartner (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman: I've extended the article. Please check before it's going deleted. Thanks. CeeGee 12:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Most appears to be routine/transfer news - where is the potentially significant coverage, beyond this which is still not ideal and certainly not enough on its own. Giant Snowman 17:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman: I^ve expanded slightly, and added two more references. Will they help? CeeGee 08:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 01:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources added, although I'm still not 100%. Giant Snowman 09:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Idiosincrático (talk) 17:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - some decent stuff from WP:NGRS.

TLA (talk) 02:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.