Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Mishraa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Might be WP:TOOSOON. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain (talk) 19:15, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vivek Mishraa[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible covert UPE article on a non notable singer who fails to satisfy any criterion from WP:SINGER and generally lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. The article references several sources all of which are unreliable like the Times of India which has been deprecated and other self published or user generated sources coupled with other sources with no editorial oversight. A before search turns up empty as well. Celestina007 (talk) 15:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 15:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 15:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 15:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 15:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Hi Celestina007, if the subject is not eligible then I think it should go on to the draft space. TryingToDo (talk)

@TryingToDo, you are article creator so I’d be as frank as can be, incubation isn't a viable option, as they aren’t notable and are unlikely to notable anytime soon, furthermore, this article has all the tale signs of UPE editing and I would not encourage UPE editing by draftifying, where you could easily move it back to mainspace in future when I’m no longer watching. Celestina007 (talk) 16:49, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Celestina007, this is not an ULE editing i was just listening song on YouTube and I liked the song. So searched about him and started editing that's it. So how can it be an UPE editing ?

By the way can you please tell me how you think that this work is an UPE ??? TryingToDo (talk)

Delete: Non notable singer who fails both WP:SINGER as well as GNG. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 09:39, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 17:38, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.