Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viva Air Peru

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Viva Air Peru[edit]

Viva Air Peru (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See WP:TOOSOON. Nothing in the article or found by Google search indicates corporate notability for this airline that is scheduled to start service. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:10, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose airline has received a license and started to sell tickets, it has also been assigned a code and callsign by the International Civil Aviation Authority, a lot more advanced then some proposed airlines. Article needs improvement but no need to delete it. MilborneOne (talk) 15:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. MilborneOne (talk) 15:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep due to all the reasons stated by User:MilborneOne, I could not have said it better myself...Antonio The Great Runner Martin (dimelo) 03, 00, April 10, 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep -- per prior outcomes, non-charter airlines are generally kept. This one appears notable: "Viva Air, the country’s first low-cost airline, offers 11 routes of domestic flights within Peru for only S/. 60" (from Gnews: link). K.e.coffman (talk) 05:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.