Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vithal Venkatesh Kamat
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Vithal Venkatesh Kamat[edit]
- Vithal Venkatesh Kamat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Questionably notable as the best I found was this, this, this and this and the article would certainly need improvement to be acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 October 5. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Article subject is a successful businessman, but the sources do not show encyclopedic notability. Mentions of awards for the hotel do not tranfer to the proprietor. I can see a case for the hotel having an article, but even that may be a stretch. Notability is not inherited, and subject does not meet WP:GNG alone. Scr★pIronIV 19:30, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. promotional and non notable. The awards if looked at m are actually fairly minor. DGG ( talk ) 20:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.