Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visionland (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 01:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Visionland (album)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on album that does not pass WP:NALBUM. Redirect to YBN Nahmir not accepted by creator but I think that would be a good outcome, Mccapra (talk) 14:30, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 14:30, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 14:30, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment as creator: this passes bullet point #1 on NALBUM and there's already three of these references on the article. versacespace leave a message! 14:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:13, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per VersaceSpace. The album has received some coverage. The sources in the article seem reliable. I found some more reliable sources about the album: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] and [8]. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 15:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to YBN Nahmir. There is not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and does not meet WP:NALBUM.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:16, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
NAlbum is clearly met here. There are multiple non-trivial works about this album. versacespace leave a message! 14:01, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 03:13, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Nomination should've been WP:SNOW closed on the day it was made IMO. My booty this topic's not notable! A Billboard interview with the rapper on the album, GQ interview on the album, Flaunt magazine, a Pitchfork review, was named by BrooklynVegan one of the best rap albums of the month, plus it sold plus its reported by HipHopDX to sell 4,000 copies in its first week, impressive for an ~~indie rap release~~. Plus, there's more if you look on Google, and there's the sources versacespace brings up above. Sure, it's not exactly the level of coverage of a Death Grips album, but it's enough to meet notability guidelines. 👨x🐱 (talk) 03:29, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
it was released by atlantic, actually versacespace leave a message! 11:10, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Really? Must've missed them. You'd think a release on a major label would get more coverage. Well, what we've found is good enough. 👨x🐱 (talk) 13:17, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.