Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishnu Institute of Technology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 07:43, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vishnu Institute of Technology[edit]

Vishnu Institute of Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL being a for-profit organization, in which case the rule says "For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria." The WP:BEFORE gave us some references like Hans India and Yourstory but nothing that make it pass WP:NCORP as they are neither RS nor independent. Chirota (talk) 23:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 23:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 23:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 23:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 23:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:27, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. EpicPupper 18:17, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 07:14, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, not enough but I found one english language reliable source, The Hindu. SailingInABathTub (talk) 20:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There's zero references in the article and all I could find was a few trivial passing mentions in school directories. Along with a couple of news articles students. Nothing that would pass WP:NORG though. That said, at least we have one source thanks to SailingInABathTub (cool name btw). I'd be more then willing too change my vote to keep if someone can come up with two more good ones. It's possible I just missed them. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deleteper above.--Ankit (Talk with me) 21:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.