Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virus and leukaemia in man

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 23:58, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Virus_and_leukaemia_in_man[edit]

This is the complete text of somebody's research paper, including the original page numbers. All sorts of reasons to delete this. Xyzzyplugh 00:06, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Its an obvious copy and paste from a publication, I've blanked (except AFD notice) and put copyvio notice. Mike _{(T C)} 00:13, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. KHM03 00:14, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Dustimagic! ^{(talk/contribs)} 00:22, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Arbustoo 00:47, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Copyvio and WP:NOR Avi 01:22, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Avi. Mak emi 01:33, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. Royal Blue 02:07, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above.Blnguyen 02:35, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per what everyone else said --† Ðy§ep§ion † ^{Speak your mind} 02:43, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Avi. Mikker ^... 03:03, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and original research.,,,,,Ariele 03:48, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete patent nonsense Terizmo 03:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment WP:PN is this really what you mean? Mak emi 04:19, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.