Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual Wife (Internet video-project)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:27, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Virtual Wife (Internet video-project)[edit]
- Virtual Wife (Internet video-project) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence that this web project is in any way notable. Google search reveals lots of "virtual wife" hits but nothing relevant. Fails WP:N, WP:VER and I suspect WP:SPAM andy (talk) 12:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with nom, fails WP:N and is very likely to be WP:SPAM as a PR move for publicity. Angryapathy (talk) 14:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete blog "founded in November 2009" Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable project, smells badly of spam. If there was some coverage outside of this article, and it were notable, maybe, but there's nothing in either of those departments. SMC (talk) 15:45, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree, bit spammy 137.73.68.56 (talk) 12:29, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. No notability, couple of low grade possible self promoted hits, seems to be brand new website trying to generate traffic.--ClubOranjeT 09:52, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.