Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual Bridges VERDE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:23, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual Bridges VERDE[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Few or no reliable sources appear to exist for this product, which has been repeatedly ~~spammed~~ added at Desktop virtualization and previously existed at Virtual Bridges. Original article was speedied, but the sole author removed the proposed deletion on this recreated article (which may not be a candidate for speedy deletion due to the fact that it focusses on the product, rather than the company itself). My hope is a clear consensus one way or another can prevent the circular pattern in the future. jæs (talk) 00:16, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, clearly spam and no notability. Haakon (talk) 16:17, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Week Delete. Virtualization is an extremely hot topic. From the article's references I suspect that a few additional and notable references may exist so let's give the author some more time to improve it. The fact that it was previously deleted for various reasons do little justice to the truth. Pxtreme75 (talk) 21:02, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm not finding significant independent coverage in reliable sources for this product. The references in the article are from technology analysys companies. I'm not familiar with these specific companies, but I suspect that they operate similar to Gartner in that subject coverage is highly absed on whatever their customers happen to inquire about. My own searches turn up only press releases. -- Whpq (talk) 17:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.