Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vipin Gopal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vipin Gopal[edit]

Fails WP:PROF, WP:BIO. --Cameron Scott (talk) 09:09, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Simply non-notable person. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 15:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above, non-notable person, no reliable sources. Derild 49 21 ☼ 19:49, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Gscholar cites are 44,41,29,22,22,17,16,13,8,etc; however, optimization is a very active field, so I do not believe, placed in context, his research to be sufficiently outstanding to pass WP:PROF. His press mentions in other contexts are plainly insufficient for the GNG. Ray^Talk 05:06, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please Delete very non-notable person and probably a self-created wikipedia page given what is commonly known about him.
Immediately previous comment seems to have no basis.
Do Not Delete This page has been in existence since Dec 2007 and vetted for about 3 years. Does not seem to be a candidate for deletion after such a long time. The subject has had notable accomplishments in many fields including professional and community leadership. Hence, a singular criteria like WP:PROF may not be appropriate. All statements seems to be validated by references, some of which are in the native language. Overall, no case for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keraleeyan1 (talk • contribs) 22:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.