Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violations of Chinese Communist Party Political Discipline
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Central Commission for Discipline Inspection#Duties and responsibilities. Liz Read! Talk! 19:40, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Violations of Chinese Communist Party Political Discipline[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Violations of Chinese Communist Party Political Discipline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The content here is entirely duplicative of and covered by Central Commission for Discipline Inspection. Recommend deleting and replacing with a redirect to Central Commission for Discipline Inspection. Amigao (talk) 18:03, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Amigao (talk) 18:03, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- It certainly looks like this article contains no information not already present in the CCDI article, but that article is longer than my attention span, so I can't verify. It also looks like this article references two sources the CCDI article doesn't: one by OECD (whoever they are), and one coauthored by Kjeld Erik Brødsgaard and himself wearing his faculty title. I see it was written with the VisualEditor, so it's probably Zotero's google books translator, with Citoid propagating the error downstream and the article's author neglecting to clean it up.Script generated citation issues aside, I think WP:BLAR to Central Commission for Discipline Inspection#Duties and responsibilities is the most reasonable outcome here, and if someone believes not all the content is present in the target article, the history will remain visible for salvage and incorporation. Folly Mox (talk) 20:32, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed with WP:BLAR to Central Commission for Discipline Inspection#Duties and responsibilities Amigao (talk) 21:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- It certainly looks like this article contains no information not already present in the CCDI article, but that article is longer than my attention span, so I can't verify. It also looks like this article references two sources the CCDI article doesn't: one by OECD (whoever they are), and one coauthored by Kjeld Erik Brødsgaard and himself wearing his faculty title. I see it was written with the VisualEditor, so it's probably Zotero's google books translator, with Citoid propagating the error downstream and the article's author neglecting to clean it up.Script generated citation issues aside, I think WP:BLAR to Central Commission for Discipline Inspection#Duties and responsibilities is the most reasonable outcome here, and if someone believes not all the content is present in the target article, the history will remain visible for salvage and incorporation. Folly Mox (talk) 20:32, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to Central Commission for Discipline Inspection as content is repetitive. Karnataka (talk) 17:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.