Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Yatz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Creeper (DC Comics). Missvain (talk) 01:34, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vincent Yatz[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by User:Andrew Davidson with the usual copy-paste edit summary that did not challenge the PROD rationale. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Creeper (DC Comics) - Unlike the other two Creeper-related AFDs today, this character does get a few brief mentions here or there under his various names, largely due to the fact that he is explicitly tied to the origin of the notable character, The Creeper. Not enough to actually pass the WP:GNG or support an independent article, but enough that it would make sense to redirect this page to the main page on the Creeper, where he is actually already discussed quite a bit. Rorshacma (talk) 15:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or delete - There are no sources to meet WP:GNG and it's all plot info. TTN (talk) 15:28, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.