Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Therraisnathan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:38, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vincent Therraisnathan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

self promotion, not notable R.srinivaas (talk) 10:09, 9 July 2014 (UTC) self promotion, not notable --R.srinivaas (talk) 16:29, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete in accordance with WP:CSD#G11. I may have missed something looking through the 50 references, but as far as I can tell, all of them are self-published, trivial mentions, youtube links, download links, directory listings, and other non-references that provide absolutely zero significant coverage of the subject. The article appears to exist purely for publicity purposes in violation of WP:NOTPROMOTION ~Amatulić (talk) 23:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - user User:Praisewinner already started offending/annoying me in my talk page for nominating Vincent Therraisnathan and S.V.S. Rathinam for deletion, please check articles linked to these articles , the creators of this page seem to create it time and again once it is deleted , please salt them.R.srinivaas (talk) 12:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 18:20, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. He apparently is credited as a musician in a couple of films but that's not enough for WP:MUSICIAN, and we also have no evidence of passing WP:PROF. Of the many footnotes, the only one that looks on the surface like it could be a good source, the Times of India one, turns out to be a search page with no results for the subject. In any case if there is some notability here the horrible writing will prevent it from being discovered, so WP:TNT applies as well. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:35, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.