Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Rivera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ron Rivera. Redirects are cheap. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 23:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Vincent Rivera

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Vincent Rivera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG as the subject shows no independent notability. The only real reason he could be perceived as notable would be him being Ron Rivera's nephew. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 21:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football, and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
• Redirect to Ron Rivera. I was not able to find coverage to meet GNG. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

I did just find this from The Daily Californian that looks like SIGCOV. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:52, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

• Redirect as above. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 23:10, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
• Delete as a non-notable assistant coach. I strongly oppose a redirect to Ron Rivera since he is not Ron Rivera. Also, there is no mention of Vincent on Ron's page. Brad Hat (talk) 16:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

  He can be mentioned in a single sentence in his family section if merged. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 21:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.