Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Hanna (Character)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:25, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Vincent Hanna (Character)[edit]
- Vincent Hanna (Character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Biography of a fictional character written entirely in an in-universe style and recapitulating information already available in the film article. Furthermore, all the references are from imdb, a nonreliable source, and it is unlikely reliable sources could be found. Simply put, there is no reason for an article about this character. RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 12:45, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- weak delete. Not an Othello... forgettable film, average performance. Why weak? The character was discussed in books (smile, there are books on Michael Mann's films) .. described as "the poorest communicator. Would anyone waste their time on "the poorest communicator", ever? East of Borschov 14:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- keep Landmark film, noteworthy main character, stellar performances all around, notable for multiple reasons including it being the first time pacino and de niro were in the same film and shared the screen. While the article itself may not be the best written, it can and should be improved vs. outright deleted. Also not the first nor last character page to be created on WP. Srobak (talk) 15:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the alleged landmark status of the film does not mean that its individual characters are notable independently. Sources appear to discuss the character only in terms of the film and do not establish that the character is separately notable. The characters can be adequately described in the film's article. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 19:46, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable Dreamspy (talk) 10:25, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.