Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Bruel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Low participation and no agreement after two relists. RL0919 (talk) 02:26, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Vincent Bruel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Vincent Bruel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article feels like a bit of a memorial page. The sources cited are pretty meagre and don’t amount to in depth coverage. A search has found nothing stronger - mostly other individuals with the same name. I don’t think this passes WP:BASIC. Mccapra (talk) 20:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 20:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 20:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

• Delete sourcing does not support notability. A search did not find enough to bring it there either. --- Possibly ☎ 20:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
• Keep Recipient of six awards: Vincent Bruel#Prizes and legacy, Vincent Bruel#World records and six inline cites at Vincent Bruel#References are more than sufficient to establish notability. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 19:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coolperson177 (talk) 22:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 01:59, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.