Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vilno programming language
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Vilno programming language[edit]
- Vilno programming language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
non-notable, when googled few hits come up, of those many are Wikipedia and it's various alternate languages, with most referring to a different subject matter entirely. PeteShanosky 00:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete. Crystalballery comes in as the author presumes that it will be successful, but it appears to be nothing more than a relatively new programming language that's still under heavy development. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "When integrated with ..., Vilno will be comparable ..." Definitely slight on substance and heavy on circumstances, like the cities. It is not notable yet. Shenme 01:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence here or elsewhere that anyone has ever used this. The fact that the main development site is an Opera blog doesn't speak well of it, either. Neither does the fact that most of the related Google hits are blog comments by the author. Zetawoof(ζ) 03:28, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and comments from Dennisthe2. -- Alucard (Dr.) | Talk 20:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't find any evidence that this is a notable piece of software. -FisherQueen (Talk) 20:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, NN, at least at the moment. Pavel Vozenilek 22:03, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --ElKevbo 22:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the nominator. Acalamari 23:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.