Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vilayna Lasalle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus seems to be that the article, even if it just barely meets GNG or BIO, ought to be deleted per the biographies of living persons policy. NW (Talk) 01:40, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vilayna Lasalle[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ENT. It's been two+ years since the article squeaked by its first AfD and it still doesn't appear the subject has done or will do anything of note. Her IMDb page is a list of bit parts of the "Sexy Girl #2" variety and having been in music videos has not saved similar articles in some recent AfDs I've seen. It looks like the article survived its first AfD based on some very lenient analysis of the refs used, of which the Muscle and Fitness ref is the only one even close to meeting WP:RS, although it's little more than a paragraph and not nearly enough to satisfy significant reliable source coverage guidelines. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 03:56, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First AfD is here. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 04:02, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence that this person passes WP:BIO or WP:ENTERTAINER. Kevin (talk) 10:24, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- - 2/0 (cont.) 16:18, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep She seems to meet WP:BIO through meeting WP:GNG with in-depth interviews in both IGN and Black Star News, and significant coverage in Muscle and Fitness. The subject seems to meet the GNG. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 20:42, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In my opinion she passes the "Significant coverage" part of WP:GNG (see links given in the previous comment by MichaelQSchmidt). Optimale ^Gu 11:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Promo-page, fails BIO and ENT. Maybe she passes ATHLETE with the Lingerie Bowl being the highest level of competition for Lingerie football? Yea, probably not. Lara 13:35, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 21:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:23, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-- but this is a challenging case of an AfD, I'll admit. To me, it's kind of like every garage band AfD where someone has 1-2 short info paragraphs in higher-level mass media, but with modeling photos instead of song names elsewhere. Even so, it'd be a challenge to convince me that someone whose notable mentions peak with at: 1) One-off tertiary tv character appearances, and 2) generic music video dancing stand-in is going to stick out much. ...Again, I mean past the modeling pictures. Alas, such a Red Herring here. All the sources given are the same (imdb), are almost 100% informational and not actual "sources", or probably shouldn't be on the page in the first place like the social networking site links. Let the record show that 2 years having passed without additions to this article possible to improve quality is precisely why WP:CRYSTAL is oft mentioned in entertainment-related deletion discussions. Datheisen (talk) 22:56, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.