Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikramaditya Singh (politician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TheWikiholic (talk) 10:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vikramaditya Singh (politician)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is not a president or head of any parties at national level. Fails to establish notability per WP:GNG. Sources are covering mainly about something else rather than the subject. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 15:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 15:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 15:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 15:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 15:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: meets WP:politician as he was elected to the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Council. Mottezen (talk) 18:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NPOL, representative in legislative body. --Goldsztajn (talk) 05:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:NPOL as a former member of the Jammu and Kashmir state legislature. -- Ab207 (talk) 21:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep He easily meets WP:NPOL and it's clearly written that he was elected for INC JK Legislative assembely. -- Jammumylove Talk to me or ^{CHECK MY RECENT WORK} 06:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Absolutely a notable Indian political figure, based on the already-cited sources alone.—Neil Shah-Quinn (talk) 19:17, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Times of India coverage is notable for that country and considered one of the major media, so it meets WP:GNG. Expertwikiguy (talk) 10:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.