Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikki Tobak (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Scott Burley (talk) 08:08, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vikki Tobak[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted in September 2017. Not seeing enough to suggest the subject is now sufficiently notable. Edwardx (talk) 19:06, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:29, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:29, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:29, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:29, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Mccapra (talk) 22:42, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:AUTHOR #3 or #4. Any of the article's useful references need reformatting, but the book "Contact High" has been profiled by a number of reliable sources and standalone exhibitions have been centered around it. Some examples: LA Times CNN Washington Post Kennedy Center New York Times WICN public radio Photo District News — Preceding unsigned comment added by LovelyLillith (talk • contribs) 00:55, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:58, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:AUTHOR. Publication of Contact High earned the subject notability she didn't have in 2017. —Rutebega (talk) 18:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:AUTHOR.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:18, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.