Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vihang Sarnaik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:40, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vihang Sarnaik[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bio that does not assert or show notability. Vihang sarnaik has been deleted previously, and two separate drafts have been declined (Draft:Vihang Sarnaik (2) and Draft:Vihang Pratap Sarnaik, which are essentially identical), and a third draft, Draft:Vihang Sarnaik, also exists but has not been submitted for review. Point is, there seems to be a concerted drive to add an article about this individual to Wikipedia.

As noted in the draft rejections, the individual is however not shown to be notable, as there are no reliable sources supporting notability. The sources are either primary or only mention Vihang Sarnaik in passing (or not at all!) - there is no significant coverage of him. bonadea contributions talk 21:36, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Spiderone 10:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I couldn't find anything else significant not in the article. Fails Google-news hits (3) - one of them being an extortion charge (where he is mentioned as one of the people called), one is gossip/fashion, and one mentions he tops the most absent listing from corporate meetings.Icewhiz (talk) 11:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.