Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Views on the 2003 invasion of Iraq

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No argument for deletion was made by the nominator (just an expression of confusion that would have been better made on the talk page, if at all), so no point to relisting for further discussion. postdlf (talk) 22:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Views on the 2003 invasion of Iraq[edit]

Views on the 2003 invasion of Iraq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What is the point of this article? Is it a disambiguation page? A list? Bonewah (talk) 15:32, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It is more or less a list. It can't be a disambiguation page because WP:DABCONCEPT (the terms are not independent, but subtopics of a general topic). It could be merged into 2003 invasion of Iraq, but that article is already enormous. bd2412 T 15:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.