Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vietnamese Constitutional Monarchist League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:38, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnamese Constitutional Monarchist League[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This organization is not in any way affiliated with the Vietnamese Monarchy movement. It has no sources, and was created by the same user who created the (also non-sourced) article about this organization's president Nguyễn Phúc Bửu Chánh, believed to be an impostor who sells "titles" for money. This article is only a front for that business. There's reading about it here, here, and here. Cagepanes (talk) 00:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. Cagepanes (talk) 01:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Cagepanes (talk) 01:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Cagepanes (talk) 01:05, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment to the nominator, Cagepanes: If you believe the page is purely promotional, please consider adding the appropriate cleanup tags, or rewriting the article. Doing so may affect the outcome of this AFD. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Added the tags just now. Good suggestion. --Cagepanes (talk) 03:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.